Board index » medical » A simple question for the Calif. Chiro Board
Todd Gastaldo
 Registered User |
A simple question for the Calif. Chiro Board
2004-06-15 02:00:15 AM
QUESTION: Does Rule 302 (or any other rule) prohibit California licensed DCs from informing pregnant women that OBs are closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines? PREGNANT WOMEN: For simple PROOF that OBs are closing birth canals - and simple instructions on how easy it is for women to allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, see the URL below. OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below) CALIFORNIA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS via webmaster1@chiro.ca.gov RONALD G. HAYES, D.C. - Chair Term Expires: February 10, 2006 R. MICHAEL HAMBY, D.C. - Vice Chair Term Expires: February 10, 2004^^^ BARBARA A. STANFIELD, D.C. - Secretary Term Expires: February 10, 2007 JOHN A. MARDER, Public Member Term Expires: November 3, 2004 STAN R. LEWIS, Public Member Term Expires: November 3, 2004 DAVID F. YOSHIDA, D.C. Term Expires: February 10, 2006^^^ SHEILA WELLS, D.C. Term Expires: February 10, 2004^^^ ^^^There is a one-year grace period following the expiration of a Board member's term. www.chiro.ca.gov/board/ Dear Board Members, I am unlicensed by choice working full-time-plus on stopping OBs from closing birth canals up to 30%. OBs are gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most babies' spines at birth. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed up to 30%. I became unlicensed by choice after being told by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the Calif. Chiro Board, that my license to practice chiropractic did not allow me to inform pregnant women that OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. I was sued for one million dollars by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the Calif. Chiro Board - the man who just happened to have authored the Calif. Chiro Board regulation (Rule 302) that ostensibly makes it illegal for California DCs to inform pregnant women that OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. I spent $2000+ dollars trying to get the trial moved to Oregon where I could afford to defend myself - but lost on jurisdiction - after which this latter Michael Schroeder (I do NOT know if he is the same as the former) was awarded a $25,000 dollar default judgement - the merits of the case never having been argued. This latter Michael Schroeder (again, I do not know if he is the same as the former) coincidentally was paid by the Calif. Chiro Board to "defend" his Rule 302 - against **10 MD-obstetricians** (et al.) who - in my view - were suing to get Schroeder's Rule 302 - not overturned but **judicially rubberstamped**. I think the 10 MD-obstetricians INTENDED to lose - to get case law on the record to *support* Schroeder's Rule 302 which ostensibly (I assumed after the call from the first Schroeder) prohibited California DCs from informing pregnant women that OBs are closing birth canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines. DOES Rule 302 (or any other rule) prohibit Calif. licensed DCs from informing pregnant women that OBs are closing birth canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines? If not, I urge each of you to do what you can to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than vaunted licensed DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. Thank you for your earliest consideration of this matter. Tiny lives and tiny limbs are at stake. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo todd@chiromotion.com PS For PROOF that OBs are knowingly closing birth canals... See: I ain't no Semmelweis, but... health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2591 This Open Letter will be archived for global access within 24 hours in the Google usenet groups archive. Search groups.google.com for "A simple question for the Calif. Chiro Board" - |